Five questions for developing an advocacy framework

An explainer

The path to achieving change is rarely linear.

There are often many obstacles to overcome internal to the organisation, within a sector and beyond.

Before we develop strategies for specific campaigns, we need to develop a framework to guide our advocacy across an organisation.

In this explainer, we unpack the five questions that organisations need to consider in developing a framework for advocacy.

1. Who are we here to serve?

It all starts with our people or communities. Understanding who we are here to serve is critical to ensuring that our advocacy helps to advance the outcomes that we seeking for our communities.

It also helps us to answer the important question of ‘Did the advocacy we engaged in today make a difference to the lives of the people we are here to serve?’ and ‘How do we know this?’.

Our advocacy is more impactful and grounded if it we have a clear understanding of our people and clear mechanisms to ensure that we are connected with and guided by these communities. This includes checking in around how we are going regularly in a real and meaningful ways.

2. What outcome do we want to achieve?

This is all about having a clear outcome for our people or communities.

Some questions that help us to identify this are ‘What outcome are we seeking to improve the lives/ health/ wellbeing of our community?’ and ‘What does it look like when we no longer need to exist because our advocacy aims have been achieved?’.

If we don’t articulate a clear outcome for our advocacy in our organisation’s vision and in each of our advocacy strategies, then we don’t know what we are trying to achieve and if we are getting closer to that goal.

3. What is our best guess at how we achieve this?

Change theories can often be presented in complex ways. But at the heart of the question ‘What is our change theory?’, is the simple proposal of how we see our organisation influencing the change we are seeking.

It can be a short statement that says ‘If we do X, then Y, they will do Z and change will happen because A.’ For example you might have a change theory that says ‘If we undertake research and develop innovative policies to address this problem, and then engage with decision makers and their influencers around these ideas, and share them in popular media, the government will adopt them because they will feel the pressure from within, their influencers and the community.’

Having a documented change theory also allows you to test your best guess at how you will drive change.

Without a change theory that articulates how we will advocate and why we think these types of advocacy will be effective, there is a risk that there will be a lack of clarity around how our organisation drives change. It will also be difficult to measure our advocacy.

4. What values guide our advocacy?

Throughout our advocacy, we will be faced with difficult questions. These might relate to the possible risks of action or inaction, or of the ambition of our policies in achieving the outcomes that we are seeking for our people or communities.

There may be disagreement on positions taken. There may also be disagreements on approaches taken in advocacy.

When we encounter these disagreements, we need to be able to refer to a set of values that are clear and are commonly understood across the organisation. We can then ask, ‘Does this align with our agreed values?’ and ‘Why or why not?’.

5. How are we checking if what we are doing is making an impact?

Like all projects and areas of work, the impact of our advocacy should be measured. Setting up a clear measurement framework against our change theory is important to ensure that we are accountable to the people and communities that you are here to serve.

This measurement should include progress markers along the way that demonstrate impact. If impact isn’t being demonstrated, it should allow for our organisations to go back to the drawing board and test another approach or theory on how to drive change.

9 June 2026

For Purpose holds training on policy, advocacy, communications, media engagement and more. Find out more here.

You might also like

The interview question that catches almost everyone out

The interview question that catches almost everyone out

The interview question that catches almost everyone out I’ve sat on both sides of the interview table. I’ve been the person asking the questions, and the person coaching people to prepare for interviews. Through both experiences, I’ve noticed that there’s one question that trips people up more than any other, ‘What do you know about…

Read

We’ve seen how this unfolds

We’ve seen how this unfolds

We’ve seen how this unfolds A video is circulating online of Australia’s richest person, Gina Rinehart asking the audience at a recent event to make the sound of a bulldozer. She then goes on to gift a toy bulldozer to One Nation Leader Pauline Hanson. In the video, Rhinehart refers to Elon Musk being given…

Read

Flooding the zone

Flooding the zone

Flood the zone An Explainer by Team FP What does it mean to ‘flood the zone’? ‘Flooding the zone’ is a political strategy where a politician or party rapidly produces a large number of communications outputs to gain attention and disorient opponents. It aims to overload the media with content to drown out criticism, shorten…

Read

What we choose to normalise

What we choose to normalise

What we choose to normalise I’ve seen some online chatter this week suggesting One Nation’s wafer-thin health policy presents a strategic opportunity. The argument being presented seems to be that if we learn to speak the language of grievance more fluently, we can occupy the space around it, shape their policy agenda and call it…

Read

The Overton Window

The Overton Window

The Overton Window An explainer by Team FP There are many theories and models that help us to understand why some policy ideas are advanced by decision makers and others aren’t. One of the most well-known is the Overton Window. This model maps policy options based on their acceptable by the public and assumes that…

Read